TVP Comms Welcomes Kristine Maloney

I am pleased to introduce the newest member of the TVP Communications team. Kristine Maloney joins us as senior strategist after assisting College of the Holy Cross for eleven years, most recently serving as director of national communications and media relations.

 

I had the distinct pleasure of working with her early in her career, and even then knew she was a healthy mix of tenacity and talent. Kristine has served as my gold standard—I’ve measured many of our peers against her personality and media successes and am thrilled she has joined us. With her onboard, our higher education capabilities are even more robust.

 

Feel free to drop Kristine a line at kristine@tvpcommunications.com. If you aren’t doing so already, please consider following her on Twitter (@kristinemaloney and @tvpcomms) and connecting on LinkedIn.

College Students, Debt and Financial Behaviors…Oh My!

This past week, Money Matters on Campus, a new report detailing the findings from a survey of 40,000 first-year college students from across the U.S. was released, demonstrating to colleges and universities how student financial problems not only impact individual student outcomes but also the institutional mission.

 

The study—conducted by EverFi and sponsored by Higher One—surveyed students on a variety of issues related to banking, savings, credit cards and school loans. You can download the full report here.

 

Not only did the survey uncover a variety of predictive behaviors and attitudes related to student financial decisions (many of which are alarming), but the report also details recommended actions to be taken in order to address the issue of financial literacy. The infographic below that summarizes the survey’s key findings.

 

A Lesson in How to Handle Volatile Press Conferences

Thanks to my colleague, Chris Syme of CKSyme.org, for allowing us to post her recommendations on press conference best practices when your spokesperson is filled with emotion. All five of her tips are critically important. I highly encourage you to follow Chris’s blog and learn great social media strategy and tactics from one of the best! Sincerely, TVP

 

On Thursday night, Syracuse head basketball coach Jim Boeheim held his usual media press conference after an upset loss to rival University of Connecticut. When ESPN basketball analyst Andy Katz wanted to ask a question, Boeheim responded by saying he would answer anyone’s questions but Katz, and called him an idiot and a “really disloyal person.” Even though Boeheim was very calm delivering his shots at Katz, it was clear that Boeheim’s emotions were frazzled and challenged after his team, rated number six in the nation, lost their final-ever conference meeting with unrated UConn.

 

The incident presents some questions. How can athletic department communicators prevent this kind of PR disaster…or can they? Some may even feel that journalists “have it coming” and don’t desire to thwart these kinds of interactions.

 

There may not be a definitive answer, but here are five alternative steps to lower the risk of these reputation killers. The fans and the journalists are not going to be wild about any of these options, but the alternatives can save emotional turmoil for coaches, players, and schools in these tough situations.

 

1.     Schedule “one-on-one interviews only” after devastating losses. There is no law that says coaches have to appear in a public free-for-all press conference immediately following a game.  In the event of a devastating loss or personal tragedy surrounding a game (athlete injury, event venue emergency, etc.), communications associates should have the freedom to set up an alternate venue arrangement where selected journalists can have one-on-one access to the coach for a prescribed number of minutes after a game. The rest of the journalists can receive their post-game quotes via the sports information director in a timely manner following the game. The practice of issuing quotes from a central source is used at NCAA men’s basketball tournaments and works just fine.

 

All it would take would be an announcement immediately following the game that the coach is going to meet one-on-one with pre-selected writers, and the rest will receive post-game quotes as soon as the interviews are over. The model of a huge post-game presser is not always in the best interest of the schools, players, and coaches. We shouldn’t be afraid to ditch the model when need be. If conference rules dictate the public post-game presser, maybe they should be re-worked. Not every coach will want this option, but some will.

 

2.     Offer a well-trained assistant coach instead of the head coach. Duke’s Mike Krzyzewski uses this option for post-game television interviews immediately following the game, and it is a good practice. Granted television viewers would rather hear Coach K talk about the game, but we’ve come to accept that associate head coach Chris Collins knows just as much about why they won or lost as Coach K does. Plus, it’s good training for the assistants to be put in the spotlight as well. Their emotion is diffused by the fact that they are substituting for their leader in a tough situation. A presser by the assistant could be followed by selective one-on-ones with the head coach.

 

3.     Set down protocols and rules for head coaches in public press conferences. Like it or not, coaches are representatives of the school’s reputation. When they sign their contract, they should sign on to the rules and protocols that protect the school’s reputation and honor the position of media members credentialed for the public conferences. If coaches break the rules, they may need to be fined or disciplined by the school or conference.  Head coaches can sometimes have a sense of entitlement about their positions, but departments shouldn’t be afraid to set down strict rules and consequences for coaches to follow.

 

4.     All coaches required to speak to the public should have media training that includes how to message the negative. It’s one thing to teach them how to smile and stand in front of a camera, but it’s another to teach them how to use message templates to answer difficult questions. We should be giving them the tools to be successful under pressure. I think we all know that the quality of being calm and professional under pressure is not innate in all coaches. Also, discourage coaches from developing relationships with media members that may cause the coaches to think of them as friends instead of journalists.

 

5.     Don’t be afraid to selectively credential media people for public press conferences. I don’t believe that giving a media person a seat courtside to cover the game automatically gets them into the post-game presser. Those are privileged seats, in my thinking, and all schools shouldn’t feel pressure to give all the media unrestrained access to their coaches and student-athletes after a game. Just make sure the credentialing process is systematic so journalists know why they are or are not included.

 

Again, this may conflict with conference or television contract rules, and should be a discussion point with those offices.  You may want to consider a two-tiered credentialing process for your events—one to cover the game and one to enter the press conference after. This also sends a message to media that access to the coach after the game is a privilege and not a right.

 

There are ways to lower the risk of a reputation-hindering event happening at a public press conference following a devastating loss or personal tragedy. Hopefully, schools will actively reconsider the long accepted post-game protocols of wide open press conferences. Coaches and schools should have the option to construct a post-game protocol that puts them in the best light possible, but still gives journalists and fans access.

Where in the World is TVP?

 

Just a quick note to say that I will be conducting media training as a pre-conference session for the CASE Development for Deans and Academic Leaders conference on February 6th in Bonita Springs, Florida. If you have a dean or leader attending, this is a great opportunity for them to learn Fundraising 101 and also hear about communications strategies for their new post. I highly, highly encourage attendance. The participants always ask the best questions and are most forthcoming with their greatest media fears.

 

Also, I was fortunate enough to be asked to join the faculty for the CASE Parent Programs workshop, which will be held in Nashville on March 6-8th. I’m excited to help Parent Programs professionals (say that ten times fast!) make the case for why they need to be a part of proactive and crisis communications.

 

Finally, the word doodle at the beginning of this post represents all of the conferences I’ve presented or keynoted at over the past four years. More importantly, it represents the may places I’ve connected with peers and made some amazing connections :) .

 

 

Lone Star Wrap-up and Final Thoughts (4:30 PM MT)

It appears that the Lone Star College situation is coming to resolution with serious injuries, not fatalities. I’m saddened to hear there are injuries, but thankful that the scope and severity of the situation didn’t increase from the preliminary reports.

 

 

With the situation winding down, I have some quick observations from a Monday quarterback.

 

 

Be careful how and when you use the terms “danger has been mitigated” and “the situation is under control.” I encourage using those terms, but only when they are true by anyone’s definition.

 

In this situation, the phrases were used during an interview with CNN. When questioned, the spokesperson stated that the situation was not over, but instead the alleged gunman was no longer on campus. You can still express a leadership stance without using language that suggests the situation has come to conclusion.

 

 

 

More importantly, there was not an issuance of care, compassion or concern for those injured in the initial interview with CNN. The spokesperson was spot-on in protecting student privacy and delineating data and timeline, but the personal touch was missing. During the 5:10 PM Eastern press conference, the institution still did not lead with care, compassion and concern. My suggestion to them from here forward would be to add an appropriate level of emotion towards the victims.

 

Next, get official communications out quickly and issue statements on behalf of the institution with news cycles in mind. “Immediately” is better for online outlets and cable news networks, but the 5 PM and 6 PM news cycles still exist for local coverage. As of the posting of this entry, I was unable to find online a written statement from the institution. Include a link to that statement prominently on your crisis site.

 

The on-air commentary prior to the 5:10 PM ET press conference was a brainstorming of questions that had not been answered or information that was being reported differently across outlets (see image below). It is understandable to have situations move quickly, but share what you know once you are able to do so.

 

 

Finally, once a situation has come fully to conclusion, be sure to communicate that to your audiences, too. Sometimes we are too exhausted for that last step, but our audiences greatly appreciate it. Doing this last step allows everyone to see the situation as truly “mitigated” and “under control.”

 

 

Lone Star College: Association and Fact Sheet Help (As of 12:50 PM MT)

The CNN reporter was asking their live expert about the average demographic for community college students. The expert was unable to answer that question, much less in a way that aligns with how the industry describes community college students.

 

Add to your crisis resources: a link to landscape data from the association for your type of institution and your institution’s factsheet.

 

For Lone Star College, a link to the American Association of Community College industry data would be helpful.